Limits
We have learned that a line L is tangent to the circle at a point P if L passes through P perpendicular to the radius at P , as shown in the graph below.
What does it mean to say a line L is tangent to some other curve C ? To define tangency for general curves, we need a dynamic interpretation of the tangency for a circle. The tangent line to a circle at a point P can be viewed as a result of the secant lines through P and near by points Q as Q moving toward P along the circle, as show in the animations below. (A line joining two points on the curve is a secant line to the curve.)
Suppose we want to find the equation of the tangent line to the parabola at the point . Since the tangent line passes through , we will be able to to get the equation of the tangent line as soon as we know its slope . The difficulty is that we need two points to compute the slope. However, we can compute an approximation to by choosing a nearby point , where , on the parabola and compute the slope of the secant line .
Here we compute the values of for several values of close to .
It appears from the table above that the closer is to , the closer is to , the closer is to . It suggests that the slope of the tangent line should be . (We shall discuss more about tangent lines in a later secession.)
Definition of a Limit
Given a function defined for all near , except possibly at . We say that
" the limit of f( x ), as x approaches a , equals L "
if we can make the values of f( x ) arbitrarily close to L (as close to L as we like) by taking x to be sufficiently close to a , but not equal to a . In this case, we write
We see from the table that the values of can get quite close to , can we make the values of as close to as we like by taking to be sufficiently close to ?
If we want the distance between and to be less than , how close to do we have to take ? And what happens if we want the distance between and to be less than ?
In other words, how close to do we have to take so that
( or ) ?
Notice that is not defined when and when . Hence, we have
which is the distance from to . For the first case, we can simply take so that 0 < , that is, the distance from to is less than . For the second case, we can take so that 0 < .
Similarly, if we want the distance between and to be less than a given number , we can take so that 0 < . Therefore,
From the argument above, we see that does not depends whether is defined at nor how is defined at . Consequently, given any number , if function is defined by
if and ,
then
In particular, we have
Example 1 Investigate .
The graph above suggests that the values of approaches as approaches . We guess that
How close to do we have to take so that ?
Notice that if and only if . That means we can take so that . Geometrically, we can also see this by the graph below.
Since is a line of slope , we can see from the graph above that it suffices to take so that
Moreover, if we want the distance between and to be less than a given number , we can take so that 0 < . Therefore, .
Example 2 Investigate .
Let's take a look at the values of for several values of close to . Since is even, we can take only positive values of .
As approaches , the value of the function seem to approach 0 ... and so we guess that
What would have happened if we had taken even smaller values of ?
Here is a graph of for t close to 0 within 0.01.
What happen to the plot ?? Does this mean that the limit is instead of ????
Notice that is not defined when and when .
So the limit should be . What was wrong with previous calculations ? ----- The CAS (Maple) gave false values due to round up errors.
Can we make the values of as close to as we like by taking to be sufficiently close to ? How close to do we have to take so that
Hence, we can take so that ( or even smaller). But this seems to be hard way to confirm that
we shall do it in another way later.
Example 3 Investigate .
Suppose that , for some number (in this case, we say exists.). Since the value of is always as approaches from the right, . But the value of is always as approaches from the left, so . Here we get a contradiction. Therefore, does not exist.
One-sided limits
We say the limit of as approaches from the left is equal to and write
if we can make the values of f( x ) arbitrarily close to L by taking x to be sufficiently close to and .
similarly, w e say the limit of as approaches from the right is equal to and write
if we can make the values of f( x ) arbitrarily close to L by taking x to be sufficiently close to and .
With these notations, we have
and
By comparing the definition of limits with the definitions of one-sided limits, we see that
if and only if and
Example 4 Investigate .
Since is an even function, we can just look at the values of for . We see from the table above that as gets close to , gets close to , and gets very large.
In fact, given a positive number ( no matter how large is), if we take then .That means the values of can be made as large as we like by taking close enough to .
Infinite Limits
Let be a function defined on both sides of , except possibly at . Then we say the limit of is infinity as approaches , and write
if the values of can be made as large as we like by taking close enough to , but not equal to .
W e say the limit of is negative infinity as approaches , and write
if the values of can be made as large negative as we like by taking close enough to , but not equal to . Similar definitions can be given for the one-sided infinite limits
From the previous discussion, we see that . Let's take a look at the graph of .
It appears from the graph above that the graph of gets closer to the y -axis as approaches to .
Vertical Asymptotes
The line is called a vertical asymptote of the curve if at least one of the following statements is true :
(a) , .
(b) , .
(c) .