Limits
We have learned that a line L is tangent to the circle at a point P if L passes through P perpendicular to the radius at P , as shown in the graph below.
![]()
What does it mean to say a line L is tangent to some other curve C ? To define tangency for general curves, we need a dynamic interpretation of the tangency for a circle. The tangent line to a circle at a point P can be viewed as a result of the secant lines through P and near by points Q as Q moving toward P along the circle, as show in the animations below. (A line joining two points on the curve is a secant line to the curve.)
![]()
![]()
Suppose we want to find the equation of the tangent line to the parabola
at the point
. Since the tangent line passes through
, we will be able to to get the equation of the tangent line as soon as we know its slope
. The difficulty is that we need two points to compute the slope. However, we can compute an approximation to
by choosing a nearby point
, where
, on the parabola and compute the slope
of the secant line
.
![]()
![]()
Here we compute the values of
for several values of
close to
.
![]()
It appears from the table above that the closer
is to
, the closer
is to
, the closer
is to
. It suggests that the slope of the tangent line should be
. (We shall discuss more about tangent lines in a later secession.)
![]()
Definition of a Limit
Given a function
defined for all
near
, except possibly at
. We say that
" the limit of f( x ), as x approaches a , equals L "
if we can make the values of f( x ) arbitrarily close to L (as close to L as we like) by taking x to be sufficiently close to a , but not equal to a . In this case, we write
We see from the table that the values of
can get quite close to
, can we make the values of
as close to
as we like by taking
to be sufficiently close to
?
If we want the distance between
and
to be less than
, how close to
do we have to take
? And what happens if we want the distance between
and
to be less than
?
In other words, how close to
do we have to take
so that
( or
) ?
Notice that
is not defined when
and
when
. Hence, we have
which is the distance from
to
. For the first case, we can simply take
so that 0 <
, that is, the distance from
to
is less than
. For the second case, we can take
so that 0 <
.
Similarly, if we want the distance between
and
to be less than a given number
, we can take
so that 0 <
. Therefore,
From the argument above, we see that
does not
depends whether
is defined at
nor how
is defined at
. Consequently, given any number
, if function
is defined by
if
and
,
then
In particular, we have
Example 1
Investigate
.
The graph above suggests that the values of
approaches
as approaches
. We guess that
How close to
do we have to take
so that
?
Notice that
if and only if
. That means we can take so that
. Geometrically, we can also see this by the graph below.
Since
is a line of slope
, we can see from the graph above that it suffices to take
so that
Moreover, if we want the distance between
and
to be less than a given number
, we can take
so that 0 <
. Therefore,
.
Example 2
Investigate
.
Let's take a look at the values of
for several values of
close to
. Since
is even, we can take only positive values of
.
As
approaches
, the value of the function seem to approach 0
... and so we guess that
What would have happened if we had taken even smaller values of
?
Here is a graph of
for
t
close to 0 within 0.01.
What happen to the plot ?? Does this mean that the limit is
instead of
????
Notice that
is not defined when
and
when
.
So the limit should be
. What was wrong with previous calculations ? ----- The CAS (Maple) gave false values due to round up errors.
Can we make the values of
as close to
as we like by taking
to be sufficiently close to
? How close to
do we have to take
so that
Hence, we can take
so that
( or even smaller). But this seems to be hard way to confirm that
we shall do it in another way later.
Example 3
Investigate
.
Suppose that
, for some number
(in this case, we say
exists.). Since the value of
is always
as
approaches
from the right,
. But the value of
is always
as
approaches
from the left, so
. Here we get a contradiction. Therefore,
does not exist.
One-sided limits
We say the limit of
as
approaches
from the left is equal to
and write
if we can make the values of f(
x
) arbitrarily close to
L
by taking
x
to be sufficiently close to
and
.
similarly, w
e say the limit of
as
approaches
from the right is equal to
and write
if we can make the values of f(
x
) arbitrarily close to
L
by taking
x
to be sufficiently close to
and
.
With these notations, we have
and
By comparing the definition of limits with the definitions of one-sided limits, we see that
if and only if
and
Example 4
Investigate
.
Since
is an even function, we can just look at the values of
for
. We see from the table above that as
gets close to
,
gets close to
, and
gets very large.
In fact, given a positive number
( no matter how large
is), if we take
then
.That means the values of
can be made as large as we like by taking
close enough to
.
Infinite Limits
Let
be a function defined on both sides of
, except possibly at
. Then we say the limit of
is infinity as approaches
, and write
if the values of
can be made as large as we like by taking
close enough to
, but not equal to
.
W
e say the limit of
is negative infinity as approaches
, and write
if the values of
can be made as large negative as we like by taking
close enough to
, but not equal to
. Similar definitions can be given for the one-sided infinite limits
From the previous discussion, we see that
. Let's take a look at the graph of
.
It appears from the graph above that the graph of
gets closer to the
y
-axis as
approaches to
.
Vertical Asymptotes
The line
is called a vertical asymptote of the curve
if at least one of the following statements is true :
(a)
,
.
(b)
,
.
(c)
.